Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Gear. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Gear. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Louis Daguerre: The Father of Photography


When looking at the beginnings of photography, diffierent arguments can be made as to who invented the first camera or who shot the first photograph. Sufficient evidence can be presented however, in favor of the pioneering inventors who first made photography available to the greater public. If ever there was a Father of Photography, Louis Daguerre would have a rightful claim to that title.

Louis Daguerre was an accomplished artist, working in the fields of architecture, theater and painting. Before his foray into photography, Daguerre was more well known for the diorama which he helped invent. It was only in 1829 that the inventor partnered with Nicéphore Niépce, another inventor who pioneered some of the earliest photographic processes, specifically the heliograph.

The heliographic process was able to record scenic impressions using plates coated with bitumen. Unfortunately, the exposure time lasted several hours or even days, something which Daguerre tried to improve on. After Niépce passed away in 1833, Daguerre shifted his attention to silver salts, compounds that were used by the chemist Johann Heinrich Schulze. Using light-sensitive silver iodide liquid to coat a glass plate, Daguerre could record images similar to the heliograph.

Just like the heliograph however, exposure times could take several hours. Through a serendipitous discovery, Daguerre found out that mercury vapor could record a fleeting image on the plate. The inventor then "fixed" the image with warm salt water. This process of exposing, developing and fixing an image became the de facto method of commercial photography from the earliest daguerreotypes to modern photographic film (dropped only quite recently in favor of digital methods).


While the daguerreotype cut down exposure times significantly, the earliest tools and chemicals used still required several minutes for one exposure. For example, in the daguerreotype above of the Boulevard du Temple in Paris, the streets and sidewalks are bare save for two people on the lower left-hand corner: a gentleman and a shoe shiner, both of whom stood in the same position long enough to be recorded on the 10-minute long exposure. This image is also being touted as the earliest photograph with a recognizable human being in it.

Daguerre initially tried to attract private investors in his invention, but his efforts failed. The inventor went public in 1839, presenting his process to the Académie des sciences. The presentation was a success, and some academy members subsequently helped Daguerre secure a lifetime pension for himself and Niépce's nephew through the French government. The daguerreotype process was then presented as a gift from France to the world for free, with the details and instructions published without fee.

Daguerre's biggest competitor during this period of discovery was Henry Fox Talbot who invented the calotype. The calotype was different in that in involved a light-sensitive paper treated with silver chloride. Exposure time with calotypes were also relatively short because only a faint image was required at first; the full image could be developed later with special chemicals on the paper "negative". Because the paper could hold the image and transfer it to a "positive image" print, multiple copies of an image could be made from only one exposure.  This potentially made it easier to market than the daguerreotype, which only produced one copy per exposure.

Talbot, hoping to make a profit from his invention, licensed the calotype to interested parties. Unfortunately, this strategy backfired as the daguerreotype was free to produce; those who wanted to make a calotype had to pay Talbot a royalty fee. This inevitably led to the daguerreotype being the first popular photographic process in the world.

The daguerreotype gradually declined in popularity around the 1860s in favor of simpler and less cumbersome photography methods such as the tintype and the ambrotype. Some modern artists such as Chuck Close and Jerry Spagnoli have pioneered a revival of the old process, and many daguerreotype enthusiasts can now be found all over the world.

The Wikipedia pages on Louis Daguerre and daguerreotype have more information on the Father of Photography and the pioneering photography process. For a modern take on the daguerreotype, check out artist Chuck Close's work. Some books on the subject include Chuck Close: A Couple of Ways of Doing Something, Camera: A History of Photography from Daguerreotype to Digital and Young America: The Daguerreotypes Of Southworth & Hawes.


A Few Quick DSLR Camera Reviews and Recommendations


A few readers commenting on the last post regarding compact camera reviews rightfully realized that because cellphone camera technology is getting better and better each year, it might not make sense to spend $200 for a separate camera. While that might be true for smaller units, most publications still look to DSLRs in the field of professional photography. Here then are a few quick DSLR Camera Reviews and Recommendations.


Nikon D700



While I have always expressed my brand loyalty to Canon, there's no doubt that other camera manufacturers like Olympus, Pentax, Sony and the like produce top-quality DSLRs themselves. However, in my experience, the only other brand that has consistently performed as Canon is Nikon. In this case, the Nikon D700 has been a good workhorse for photojournalists and wedding photographers in the Nikon camp.

If you're complaining about the paltry 12.1 MP resolution, there's the upgraded Nikon D800 with 36.3 MP of image resolution, but unless your images are going up on 100-foot billboards and you have an extra $1,000 to spare, the D700 will suit most everyone's needs.



Canon EOS 5D Mark II


Yes, Canon has upgraded this camera to the 5D Mark III, but why spend $1,300 more when you can get all that full-frame goodness in the Mark II? Granted that the Mark III has significant improvements in terms of speed, ISO performance, HD video recording, etc. but the Mark II can still hold its head up high.

When this camera was first released in 2009, it was a game changer in almost all aspects of modern commercial photography. Suddenly, anyone with the right budget could have a professional camera for the fraction of the price. It's 21.1 MP picture capability was the right mix of large resolution and quality. It's HD video capability spawned a new generation of cinematographers.

This was the first camera that truly impressed me as the right balance between price and performance, and I think the Mark II will be a classic for as long as Canon continues to manufacture it, regardless of the future Mark IV, V, VI, etc. iterations there will be.



Of course, a DSLR body wouldn't be complete without a few lenses and accesories, so here are a few:


Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8 L USM Lens


A good camera like the 5D Mark II also deserves a good lens, and if you could only pick one lens, it would have to be the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM. This won't get you those impressive bird shots from a hundred feet away, nor will it give you those ultra close-up, wide-angle views, but it's a great general purpose lens that delivers superb images, and that's good enough.

Yes, it's big. And heavy. And it doesn't have Image Stabilization, but it's not called the bread and butter lens for nothing. It's built like a tank and, coupled with the 5D Mark II, feels very comfortable in the hands. I  have yet to meet a serious photographer who's regretted purchasing and using this lens for their everyday photography.

The only downside to this lens is that it the upgraded version has been delayed, so if you're in a hurry, you'll have to settle for this 2002 version which is still pretty good, all things considered.



Canon  BG-E6


The light and small profile of the 5D Mark II makes it a great DSLR for everyday use. That is, until you find yourself shooting vertical most of the time. Then you realize light and small isn't so great without a vertical battery grip. This is where the Canon BG-E6 Battery Grip comes in. The device attaches beneath the camera and inserts through the battery slot. You can use either 6 AA batteries or 2 Canon LP-E6 Batteries (I tend to go with the LP batteries, but if you want to go with AAs, check out the Sanyo Eneloop ones below). This not only gives you a more comfortable grip, it also doubles the life of your batteries, which is a nice touch if you're scheduled shoot takes you most of the day.

There are of course third-party branded battery packs for $200 less, but if you're going to stick something into your $2,000 DSLR, it might as well be a branded and reputable product like the official grip.



 Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT Flash


I personally haven't tried out the Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT Flash, but from the reviews I've read, this external flash is the the logical iteriation after the Canon Speedlite 580EX II. While the larger guide number (which means more light power) is very much appreciated, the real feature is the wireless radio system which allows it to communicate wirelessly with your DSLR, and control up to five other external Speedlites.

So far, reviews have been mostly good, so this will be my next purchase (should my current 580EX decide to fail).



Sanyo Eneloop 1500 4 Pack AA Ni-MH Pre-Charged Rechargeable Batteries with Charger

Eneloop's Rechargeable Ni-MH batteries are the go-to batteries for Canon's Speedlite flash. Actually, they're the go-to batteries for all brands of external flash. The company's reputation rests on their long-lasting charge (these particular set comes pre-charged, so you're assured that the batteries can in fact hold on to their charge), and their consistent performance time after time.

Every time you use the flash, the batteries give a short burst of intense power. Because professionals rely on the batteries to do this every few seconds, it's not hard to see why battery life is of utmost important. While I'm not sure how my half a dozen or so sets of Eneloop batteries have fared over the last few years, these guys have a lifetime of 1,500 charge cycles so I think I'll be alright for a few more years.

Get a a few packs for your external flash, and then a few more for your other household electronics.



Conclusion
Going into digital photography is not cheap, and unless you're a millionaire, you should spend days and weeks and months researching and testing the gadgets yourself. Hopefully, these short DSLR and accessories recommendation and review links will help you decide if you're will to spend more than $1,000 with camera gear, or just fiddle around with Instagram.



A Few Quick Compact Camera Reviews and Recommendations


Some of my friends have been asking for my recommendation on camera gear, so this week I'll be diverging a bit from the usual Reel Foto blog photographers' series and give you a quick rundown of what I think are the best compact cameras out in the market today, along with a few links to more reviews and recommendations. I won't go into detail about each product, or describe their pros and cons. I'm simply listing down three compact cameras that should suit 99% of your everyday photography needs based on my very biased view.



Canon PowerShot ELPH 300 HS


The Canon PowerShot ELPH 300 HS is the latest offering by the industry giant in the budget range. For $160, you get 12.1 MP of picture resolution plus 1080p HD video in a compact package that comes with 5x optical zoom. That's probably more resolution and zoom you'll need for casual occasions.

The only downside in my experience is the so-so build quality; I've seen a few older ELPH and IXUS cameras with their paintwork faded away, but the real concern is the plastic housing, especially around the lens mechanism (the glass opening at the center) as I've had a friend's IXUS camera shut down after its lens covering wouldn't open. That was with an older model however, and for less than $200, it was well worth the thousands of pictures she took with it.

If you have absolutely no idea about where to start with compact cameras and you're only willing to spend less than $200, then this is the best choice in the market right now. Here are few more sites that might be helpful.

Canon Powershot S100


The Canon PowerShot S100 looks conspicuously like it's little brother the ELPH 300 above. With the ability to take 12.1 MP images and 1080p HD video in a 5x optical zoom package, it even sounds like the same camera. However, the similarities end there. This solidly-built camera has a fast f/2.0 lens at its widest zoom (meaning it captures slightly better pictures with less light available), captures in RAW format (which is a better format for storing and manipulating images) and has full manual controls for precise picture taking.

For $370, you would think that you'd get more than 5x optical zoom, but the S100 already delivers quite a punch for its slim form. In fact, it's small size is what swayed me when choosing between this and its equally impressive and much more established cousin the Canon G12 (pictured in the header photo above); I mean, if I needed the added functionality of the G12, I would just bring my DSLR.

This camera is really meant for professional photographers who want a compact camera  for everyday use, or for serious hobbyists who don't want to spend $1,000 on bodies and lenses.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5


The Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 can capture 10.1 MP images and 720p HD video with its 3.8x optical zoom. If you're wondering why this Panasonic camera has slightly less features than its comparable Canon offerings, its because this camera was introduced in 2010 and hasn't been updated since. Still, it has the same tantalizing fast f/2.0 lens along with a hotshoe, something the Canon S100 doesn't have.

The most impressive feature for this camera is its DC Vario-Summicron lens provided by the German optics leader Leica. In fact, this is almost the exact same camera as the more prestigious and expensive Leica D-LUX5 as both are made by the same Japanese manufacturer, only the Panasonic is $400 cheaper.

Aside from the difference in resolution and lens zoom, there's really nothing substantial that you can compare with this camera and the Canon S100. Both cameras can capture great images, and in the hands of people who know what they're doing, it would be hard to tell the difference unless you were really nitpicking. The bottom line is: both cameras are fine choices.



Conclusion

If you're just starting out in photography and don't know which compact is best, go with the Canon PowerShot ELPH 300 HS. Otherwise, if you already know what you're doing more or less, go with the Canon PowerShot S100 or Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5.


Omax Photographics Ad: How to Sell an Ultra Wide Angle Lens


Posting on April 1st is sometimes risky if you want to be taken seriously as everyone thinks that every other post is a joke, but this ad by Omax Photographics is no gag; it might look like some sort of parody for one of their lenses, but it is in fact a real advertisement.

Omax Photographics is a brand of camera equipment manufacturer based in New Delhi, India. In 2009, they releases a series of images intended to promote their wide angle lenses. They are either brilliant or on the verge of parody.

For those who don't get the joke, the ads play on the functionality of wide-angle versus telephoto lenses. Telephoto lenses allows photographers to capture subjects from afar, while wide-angle lenses allow them to take in more of the scene in front of them. This is why wide-angle lenses are typically used for landscapes or photojournalism situations in extremely cramped or tight spaces.

Ultra wide-angle lens (or UWA lenses) allow photographers to capture subjects that are at the extreme edges of the scene before them, albeit with some barrel distortion. These Omax lenses therefore claim to to give you a view of the scenery to your extreme left and right.


There was some controversy when this ad came out because the copy looked remarkably similar to an ad for Leica wide angle lenses. Take a look at Leica's version below and you decide which is the copycat.


In any case, both Omax and Leica (and their respective ad agencies Publicis Gurgaon (India) and Demner Merlicek & Bergmann (Austria) ) did a great job showing the world just what an ultra wide-angle lens can do.

The Nifty Fifty: A Canon 50mm f/1.8 Lens Review


The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II lens was my first lens purchase after I got my DSLR, and it should be the first lens on any new photographer's to-buy list as well. I had spent two or three months browsing the Internet for recommended lenses for beginners, and this one was always near the top of the list. This semi objective review should help you decide whether or not to purchase it for yourself.

The 50 mm f/1.8 is not a zoom lens; it is a prime lens or a fixed focal lens meaning it only captures an image at that particular focal range. In exchange for zoom range, prime lenses are often sharper, have better color saturation and have a much larger aperture value.

Nevertheless, its fixed 50mm focal frame has earned it the nickname the Nifty Fifty, and it truly is. On a camera with an APS-C sensor like one of the Canon Rebels, it's effectively an 85mm lens, making it a bit too tight for most group shots; if a person stood about five feet away from you, the camera would only be able to capture his upper body and face. In contrast, a typical digital point-and-shoot camera has an effective focal range of about 28mm when zoomed out, enough to fit a whole party in front of you.

Despite this limitation, it can be quite effective for candid shots and low light situations. Even with its longer focal length, it can be very useful for street photography once you get the hang of it.

I sold my copy to a friend not too long ago since I was using my Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM lens about 90% of the time, but I've kept many pictures I've taken with my 50mm, and I find myself missing it sometimes.

For anyone thinking about purchasing or borrowing this lens, here are a few advantages and disadvantages to the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II:

1) It's cheap.

Comparatively speaking, it's very affordable at around $100 (the price may be different depending on your location). However, don't let that price fool you; it's capable of some amazing shots.

It will repay itself many times over once you find out how incredibly functional it is. If you're considering an extra purchase when buying your first DSLR, your camera shop might be persuaded to lower the lens price. It's so cheap that there's really no good reason why you shouldn't get it.

2) It's sharp.

Well, it's sharp stepped down. Wide open at f/1.8, it's very soft, so much so that you might think your image isn't in focus. The narrow aperture doesn't help that fact. However, stepped down to f/2.0 or f/2.4, it becomes usable. At f/2.8 it's very sharp and you hardly notice any vignetting.

This is the beauty of the prime lens; they are incredibly sharp and they're most often used for magazine shoots and wedding engagements. If you know how to mask the 50mm's flaws, you can use it for professional shoots as well. I know quite a few photographers who do this on paid gigs to good effect. 

3) It's light and simple.

The lens is much lighter than the kit lens, allowing you to hold the camera comfortably with only one hand. In addition, its uncomplicated design makes it a breeze to handle. There's no zoom ring to fiddle with, no extra buttons to press. With this piece of glass, there's only one zoom setting: what you see is what you get.

After awhile, you begin to appreciate the limitation of the prime lens. When you put the camera to your face, you don't need to zoom in or zoom out. All you need to do is compose your shot, and click the shutter.

4) It provides exceptional training.

The first few days using this lens can be very awkward, especially if you're used to the 18mm wide end of your kit lens, but the lens slowly trains your eye to determine what part of the horizon in front of you can fit into your 50mm frame.

Getting used to the nifty fifty's range, you'll find yourself becoming an expert at focal ranges: even before you raise the viewfinder to your eye, you'll immediately know whether a scene fits into a 50mm frame. After switching between lenses, you'll soon be good enough to tell which scenes require a lens with a 24mm, 35mm, 50mm or 100mm focal length.

The lens will also help you determine what kind of shooting style you want. I know a lot of photographers who bought three or more lenses at the beginning of their hobby or career, only to find out they only used two of them most of the time. When you're stuck with the 50mm, you'll often find yourself either backing up to take in more of the scene in front of you, or moving forward to get a closer look.

After a few more months of this, you'll know for certain whether you need that 10-22mm ultra-wide, or that 70-200mm bread-and-butter wedding lens.

For the price, the lens offers a great deal for new photographers. However, not all is perfect. Here are a few caveats against the lens: 

1) Its Auto-Focus is slow and noisy.

Compared to the 18-55mm kit lens, the auto-focus speed is about on par. However, the 50mm is noticeably noisier. This might not bother you, but in situations where quiet discretion is key, a noisy lens might distract from the occasion.

The AF also has a problem in low-light situations. It hunts around and sometimes does not acquire focus. In addition, on some copies of the lens, you might find a slight front-focusing problem. This can be a bit irritating especially at wide apertures, but most people don't notice that problem, especially when you don't crop the image.

A little side-note for Nikon readers, the Nikon AF Nikkor 50 mm f/1.8D does not auto-focus on entry level cameras like the D3100 or D5000. While Nikkor lens can be mounted onto these cameras, the lens unfortunately does not have an internal auto-focus motor, so you will have to manually focus the lens yourself. 

2) It produces ugly bokeh.

The five aperture blades of the Canon 50mm unsurprisingly offer very lazy bokeh. It's not a deal breaker, considering that the bokeh is the out of focus portion of the image, but once you know about it, you can't help but notice it.

To Nikon's credit, the Nikkor version has seven blades and produces beautiful bokeh in my opinion.

3) It's build quality is subpar.

The lens is predominantly made of plastic, and sometimes feels like a child's toy. Nevertheless, because of its small size and light weight, you probably won't notice it.

The plastic construction offers adequate protection for the glass inside. Only a deliberately hard blow to the lens would deal it any lasting damage.

These disadvantages might sound discouraging, but this is just to offer you a more objective review of the lens. If you were to ask me whether or not you should buy it, the answer is a resounding "YES"! In my opinion, the advantages more than outweigh theses small disadvantages.

Buy it, rent it or borrow it. If you can spend $800 on a camera, you can spend an extra hundred to allow you to capture better photos.  Other than your kit lens, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II lens should be one of the first lenses you mount on your camera. If this personal review has convinced you, purchase the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens along with the Fotodiox Dedicated Lens Hood, for Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Lens as Canon ES-62 and Professional High Quality 3 Piece Filter Set For Canon SLR Cameras That Have A Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Lens.





CanoNikon



CanoNikon is the term most often used to describe the rivalry between fans of Canon and Nikon. Both companies are the worldwide leaders when it comes to modern 35mm cameras and for good reason; the quality of their bodies and lenses rank among the best anywhere. Professionals use them for portraiture, sports, photojournalism, etc. Visit any country and one of either will have a large presence. It's the same in my locality where the two are neck-and-neck in terms of sales.

Other companies like Pentax and Olympus, although very established camera brands, have only recently become more aggressive in terms of DSLR innovations. This has allowed newcomers like Panasonic and Samsung to come in and take a slice of the pie.

Recently, I've seen some photographers sport Sony bodies and lenses, although they are the exception as Sony's prices are too prohibitive to take a bigger share of the market; the quality of their cameras is quite good, but at their current prices, you would expect something quite spectacular. Nevertheless, Sony's marketing team here has done a good job to attract a steady base of customers.

With these newer brands coming in, it's difficult to make a more objective decision, especially if you have no idea what to look for in a camera. Personally, I went back and forth between Canon and Nikon and finally (and happily) settled with the Canon 450D years ago for a few reasons... 

1) Canon cameras feel comfortable in my hands.

Our family had a beat-up Nikon point-and-shoot film camera several years ago held together by tape and sentimentality. We continue to use this camera up until digital cameras became popular.

When the film camera finally stopped working, we sprang for the Canon SX100, a higher-end point-and-shoot digicam. In my opinion, the transition from film to digital was illuminating; this was the camera that awakened the photographer in me. 

For the price, it was an amazing camera: 10x zoom, 8 megapixel resolution, auto and scene modes, and best of all, it had full manual controls. As a beginner photographer, I thought the auto mode on sunny days was excellent and its low light ability was great for its time.

As I became more and more adept, the manual controls made for a much more fun experience when learning about aperture, shutter speed, ISO and other photography basics.

When I decided to upgrade from the SX100 to the 450D DSLR, the choice was easy; the Canon cameras' controls were similarly laid out, comfortable and very intuitive.

2) Most of my friends have Canon gear.

This can actually be a big influence when you're asking for advice offline or if you've purchased a different branded camera. It can be very frustrating to be the only one in your group dealing with technical problems specific to your model.

For example, a friend of mine recently bought a Sony DSLR (it was an older model and was on sale). It was an excellent camera and it felt much more comfortable in my hand than my own Canon 450D. However, since he was used to handling my Canon camera months before, he had a difficult time adjusting to his own unit. I helped him out whenever I could, but there was very little I could do with my limited knowledge of Sony's cameras and lenses.

In contrast, I have a much more fun time when I'm with friends who have Canon bodies. It's something you don't notice when you're browsing in the store or over the Internet, but the fact that you're in the same-feathered group can matter a great deal in the long run.

3) Canon has a service center in our town. 

Looking around for my first camera was easy because of the number of photography shops in the locality. In particular, having a Canon showroom and service center proved to be the icing on the cake. The staff members there were helpful and knowledgeable, and assured me that if anything ever happened to my camera, I could take it back and have it repaired for free (with the warranty).

Although nothing serious has required me to take my unit back, it's nice to know that the service center is there. Like they say, it's better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it. From time to time, the center also offers free cleaning services and routine inspections, a big plus for their marketing. 
In the past two years, Sony and Panasonic both opened service centers in the area that also cater to consumer and professional DSLRs, although their presence is mostly due to their local sales of TV screens, entertainment centers and other electronics.

If you own a Nikon camera and it suddenly stops working, I have no idea where you can have it fixed in my town.


On a related note, I find the current generation of Canon DSLR bodies and lenses much more aesthetically crafted compared to their Nikon counterparts, but I think that's just a personal bias that's grown throughout the years I've had my own Canon 450D.

If you're shopping around for a new camera, both Canon and Nikon are excellent brands, and have fantastic track records of quality products. It will take a few more years for the other brands to consistently prove themselves with their own line of cameras, but that shouldn't stop you from choosing any of these.

Google about the latest camera reviews, ask your friends and try them out for yourself. That's the only real way you'll find the camera meant for you.